American scholar Moshe Alamar (Moshe Alamaro) from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology says that there are technologies control hurricanes. The bottom line is artificially controlling the temperature in different parts of the incipient tornado. Motion control is targeted by heating or cooling of certain areas by seeding with soot, water evaporation, microwave irradiation, and the laser podobnogo.Po the scientist, a great way to affect the wind will be a great ship, equipped with two dozen jets that create a powerful updraft air. In just a few hours of operation begin to form a tornado, and it obediently following the vessel. In practice, to equip a ship like "tornadogeneratorom" snap.
Recent events in Japan and the powerful tsunami in Indonesia in 2004 raise questions: can cause such catastrophic events artificially? 10 years ago was made public secret U.S. project Project Seal (1944-1945 years). This military program under the direction of Professor Thomas Leech (Thomas Leech) assumed explosion on the sea floor a large quantity of explosives, which must have caused a local tsunami, washing away buildings along the coast of the enemy.
Fragments photo reports on the draft Project Seal, which was an attempt to create a weapon, causing a tsunami. Similar development with nuclear weapons offered Andrei Sakharov
Low power testing conducted in the Pacific Ocean, near the peninsula Vangaparaoa (New Zealand). The subjects considered them successful, but still do not know what actually ended the project. Later also conducted numerous sea trials of powerful nuclear bombs, which are more suitable for the creation of giant waves. There is evidence that most of Thomas Leach planned to go to the site of the nuclear tests at Bikini Atoll in order to gather information useful for tsunami-bomb project. As far as we know, he is in these trials did not participate.
But back to today's events, and ask whether it is possible to link the recent devastating tsunami tsunami using atomic-bombs? In practice it turns out that to prove the fact of the underwater nuclear explosion, which also takes place against the background of a strong earthquake is extremely difficult, and the charge of murder of tens of thousands of people need serious evidence.
It should also be said that the developed countries that are vulnerable to tsunami-bombs, not too many, and among them the United Kingdom, and Japan. But the most vulnerable U.S..
Blow from the ionosphere
Ionosphere is the part of Earth's upper atmosphere, located at an altitude of 50 km. It contains a large number of ions and free electrons, which protect us from cosmic radiation. The influence of the ionosphere on the Earth's climate is not fully understood, but it is expected to significantly.
The impact on the ionosphere to create destructive natural phenomena is the most controversial and most discussed part of the history of geophysical weapons.
Debate compounded by the impact of two instruments on the ionosphere are well known: high Russian SURA transmitter and a similar, but more complex major U.S. HAARP.
Initially, the two systems were built as test benches for exploring the impact of the ionosphere to disrupt radio communications, intercepting ballistic missiles and other aircraft. Installations of HAARP and SURA with high-frequency radiation can heat a certain area of the ionosphere and create a plasmoid — plasma cluster, consisting of magnetic fields and plasma.
Plasmoid has great energy, he has the potential to destroy the electronics and reflect radio waves. Thus, with plants such as HAARP can create a gigantic radiolinzu reflecting radio beam in the desired direction, or vice versa — absorbing it.
Actual installation can project electromagnetic radiation in any part of the planet. The radiation power is a mystery. It is believed that the HAARP installation in Alaska is capable of delivering up to 3.6 MW, and SURA — 750 kW. However, it is believed that the United States built a similar installations in other regions of Australia, Greenland, Norway and Asia.
Of rumors and myths about HAARP set. Fans of conspiracy theories believe that the installation can cause earthquakes, radiating certain "resonant" wave that trigger shifts of the crust. There are opinions that HAARP radiation can even cause panic and insanity of thousands of people. As the "examples" are numerous earthquakes in different parts of the world, people's uprisings and military coups. Write a book about how the United States and the Soviet Union (and later Russia) exchanged "geophysical strikes" and that climate war continues to this day. But all these "evidence", supported by photographs of unusual clouds, large hail, lightning and strange colored rains usually explained routine atmospheric phenomena or the result of industrial activity.
"Forest" antennas on site SURA
Resolve the dispute, whether HAARP and SURA weapon can answer the question: can these high frequency low energy emitters start any severe natural disasters? Most scientists studying atmospheric phenomena, to doubt it. Just remember that the sun every day down on the ionosphere by orders of more energy, and atomic explosions per second sent to the power of the earth's crust, not comparable with radiation or thousands of antennas HAARP.
Numerous experiments conducted at the Arecibo Ionospheric heaters and other plants have shown that you can not cause long-term changes in the ionosphere — all disturbances made by man, fade in a few seconds or minutes.
In addition, the heating of the ionosphere is not possible during the day, because due to solar ultraviolet radiation D-region of the ionosphere (60-90 km) absorbs radio waves used by HAARP.
Of course, we can not exclude the use of military installations such as HAARP and SURA, possibly, the military are working on promising technologies that can be used for heating of the ionosphere electronic warfare, disabling satellites, ballistic missile warheads, as well as the-horizon communications. But looks doubtful involvement of modern devices with energy even if it is in the tens of megawatts to the earthquakes and tsunami that release thousands of gigawatt every second. In the long term heating of the ionosphere by high-frequency super-powered transmitters can be used as a geophysical weapon, for example, as a way of weakening of the ozone layer over enemy territory or heating of the atmosphere in order to influence the processes of nature. This requires accurate modeling of the Earth's atmosphere in real time and the vast energy resources.
Speculations about the geophysical weapon rarely accompanied by demonstration of facts. This is natural — its essence in stealth. Management of natural disasters becomes meaningless if it attracts the world's attention — in this case it is easier to manage economic pressure and precision strikes.
At the peak of the active work on creation of geophysical weapons in 1977 signed the UN Convention "On the Prohibition of Military or any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques." Its purpose is to prevent the use of the environment as a weapon of war, for example, provoking storms, tidal waves, etc. This document was signed by the leading countries of the world and puts geophysical weapons on a par with nuclear.
The use of large-scale geophysical strikes now will not only condemnation of the international community, but also serious response comparable to the response to a nuclear attack. This suggests that the "strategic" geophysical weapon, which could lead to such disasters as hurricane "Katrina" in 2005, and drought in Russia in 2010, or does not apply, or there is a global conspiracy of dozens of countries, including and to the detriment of their own interests.
Last seen as highly unlikely.
However, the use of geophysical weapons in a limited area is not only possible, but inevitable. The U.S. military has not abandoned the idea of the weather changes in the local theaters. Moreover, the technologies will work out in 2025. Tactical advantages include creating low cloud covering the aircraft from ground observation, veil covering the ground forces, and so on.
Projects technologies changing climate were "pull the shade" generous military funding. It is hoped that people do not lose their right to sunlight, heat, water, and air.