October 4, 2013. The UN once again frightened humanity threat of global warming, however, the report on which was represented a catastrophic scenario, it would be nothing more than science fiction. Despite this, the European Commission has announced ambitious plans in the field of \»climate legislation\».
Supporters of global warming theory has dealt a blow to themselves. The efforts of the most prominent climate-alarmists, the intergovernmental panel on climate change at the United Nations published a report that hit the scientific community for its antinauseant. \»It is extremely likely (95% accuracy)that more than half of the values from the warming of the earth’s surface in 1950?2010 caused by carbon dioxide emissions associated with human activities,\» reads the report, which scientists have named collection of pseudoscientific nonsense. On the basis of the report prepared by the Atlas, which should demonstrate to the wider public \»horrors\» of global warming, if mankind will not stop the emission of carbon dioxide. Thus, according to UN experts, 2081 year average temperature in Western Europe will grow at about 4?5 C, in Eastern Europe — 7?9, and in Siberia more than 11 degrees. Rainfall in Germany and France will increase by 40?50 percent.
\»The latest report came down to the level of foolish nonsense, \» admitted one of the leading climatologists, Professor Massachusetts Institute of technology Richard Lindzen (Richard Lindzen). They reported increased confidence in their models, but the gap between models and observed reality only grows\». The scientist notes that the authors decided to ignore the fact that over the past 17 years, the temperature increase was observed: \»the Fact that, during this time, was not observed temperature increase, they justify the fact that allegedly the heat went into the depths of the ocean. However, this assumption simply says that their models cannot simulate the exchange of heat between the earth and the ocean.
It is based on questionable models experts build catastrophic scenarios that have already picked up many \»green\» policy. \»As their models, they deserve less confidence than monthly forecast from a drunk meteorologist, says in its editorial edition of Investor’s Business Daily. Just a few months ago edition of Nature Geoscience published a study showing that climate sensitivity to CO2 is much less those values operated by the expert panel. It is obvious that politics has long squeeze the science of this body. We believe 110%\».
However, the questionable degree of scientific UN report did not bother the European Commissioner for climate change Connie Hedegaard (Connie Hedegaard), required in connection with this publication and to tighten control over emissions of carbon dioxide, \»In that day, when science with 100% accuracy confirms the threat of global warming, it will be too late. Why put yourself at greater risk, when at stake is the health of the entire planet? Europe will continue to occupy a leading position in the fight against global warming. We have ambitious plans in the field of law.\» Here, in this phrase, and there is a solution to global climate phenomenon, after all be not what it is, namely ambitious plans — the dream of any policy.