Recently, I increasingly get a phone call the leaders of hunting management, regional society of hunters, scientists, game wardens from about one question: what to do? Department of hunting and other features (that the logic of the Russian language and professional sense can not be perceived) of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation has created a lot of stress throughout the hunting community of Russia. Most of all it concerns the registration of hunting resources, particularly in the performance of work under winter route accounting hunting resources.
Photo by Sergey Fokin
Order came from the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation 11.01.2012 № 1 requiring all organizations conducting winter route accounting (MFP), make it with certain models of GPS receivers and submissions with the account «tracks» routes. Even then, all the hunting authorities and local hunting grounds users howled against unexpected future requirements and exorbitant financial costs. In hunting the media showered numerous letters protesting, published many articles critical of such an approach. There was a delayed reaction Ohotdepartamenta MNR — Order from 13.11.2014 № 58, which is not only to defuse tensions in hunting, but also created more confusion.
The most important thing — Federal and some regional state authorities Hunting accounting data used in the illegal hunting users blackmail: marriage is allowed in accounting data — close hunting. Idiocy! Accounting for animals — is sacred, it is necessary for monitoring the status of animal populations and the development of economic decisions on rational, sustainable use of hunting resources. It is obliged to Ohotdepartamentu, but not employment blackmail, clearly illegal, provide fertile ground for corruption.
We Nikita Gennadyevich Chelintsevym as leading experts, created in the 70s of the last century the State Service accounting hunting resources of Russia, was asked to give an opinion on the said orders MNR, mainly on techniques SCM approved these orders. The conclusion we reached, it will be published after review by the Minister of Ministry of Natural Resources SE Don. Now we can briefly say that there is. Director Ohotdepartamenta argues that any changes SCM methodology orders number 1 and number 58 have been made. False! Continuity methodology violated the comparability of results with data from previous years is broken, thus about any long-term monitoring can not be considered. The standards required volume credentials taken «from the ceiling»Without a sound scientific approach. These standards should be based on the statistical accounting errors that obsolyutno different in different regions of Russia. Are our regulations approved yet Glavohotoy RSFSR in 1990, calculated according to the actual data records of previous years. We turned out that in the central regions of European Russia to account for large areas need to lay the 150 routes and making 35 of tracking by 1 million hectares, and in many regions of the Federation in Siberia, the Far East — 30 routes and 7 of tracking on the same territory. There is a difference. Uniform standards for the whole of Russia can not be!
In our opinion there are many reasons to support insolvency procedures on the orders number 1 and number 58 to prove incompetence of the drafters of these guidance documents, violate the continuity of methods and incomparability of data for long-term monitoring of hunting resources. I hope everyone understands that competent game manager.
So how long all hunting country will not tolerate the arbitrary officialdom Ohotdepartamenta? And then there’s validation of expenditure on subventions, saying that we will not verify compliance with the order number 58, and by the order № 1. Although horseradish radish is not sweeter! Ask these inspectors, they understand something in the registration of animals? Or are they stupid perform silly orders written, «lyumenevy»Everyone should say lyumenevy.
If nothing is done, it will be even worse. We need to write to all public authorities of Russia on the outrages that take place to be hunting. The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation to the Committee on Anti-Corruption Policy of the Russian Federation State Duma, the Russian Prosecutor General’s Office, the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation, the Government of the Russian Federation. Better — all addresses. The main thing that it was a stream, a flurry of letters, simultaneous, mass. Then, perhaps, the authorities will pay attention to the problem of hunting, to the needs of ordinary hunters hunting in the ridiculous position of officials in the field, which puts them Ohotdepartament MNR on nurturing this department of corruption in our industry.
Vladimir Kuzyakin27 March 2015 at 00:00